Thursday, November 26, 2009

his endless walk of shame

on october 1, 2009, in the sleepy town of fairfield, connecticut, the fairfield university student newspaper published the ramblings of one chris surette, whose beefy jock-face stares out at the reader, under the title "her walk of shame".

whatever i was doing at the time must have been far more important than the tempest stirred up by this "scandalous" article.

let's understand one thing: the first amendment to the constitution of the US protects the right of anyone (with a few exceptions of which this is not one) to say and publish anything (with a few exceptions of which this is not one). so i am not going to demand that he be reprimanded, or his newspaper be reprimanded or even fairfield university get a slap on the wrist. he has probably come to realize by now that this article was not a very smart one, nor was it a good idea to publish it.

while searching for something entirely unrelated i fell into the "her walk of shame" page a few minutes ago. below you will find the comment which i have left at the site.

let's not forget chris surette.



he wanted fame and got notoriety instead.

* * *

so high school.

first of all one wonders at whom this is aimed - and i speak as someone who has been writing most of her life.

while it mostly addresses the "boys", it throws the odd bit toward the "girls". now, the last time i looked i found that most students at post-secondary institutions were adults or nearly adults, at least chronologically. am i then to assume that the author is addressing the very youngest members of the student body?

let's see.

the "lucky guy" can share this story at the grape - why, it's a pub. the lucky young guy is thus counselled not only to have a bit of rumpy-pumpy with someone he might not wish to invite into his bed when sober, the "girl" (presumably also very young, given that she clearly has not the discrimination to select the more honourable guy from the tools) is advised that the story of her conquest will be shared ad nauseam around the beer-soaked tables of the grape. as it appears that every one of you tools is seriously swilling draft instead of educating himself, that nauseam will come sooner than you think.

and it sounds like underage drinking to me. it's actually inadvisable to support underage drinking in most jurisdictions. i live in a more liberal country than you and still one looks askance at anyone who actively supports or advises breaking the law.

secondly i have a bit of a quibble with your continuity. lucky young stud, you have managed to invite "the swan" to "your place"; when the next morning you might be disillusioned by your partner, it is recommended that you "get out of there".

eureka! this article is aimed at morons! who else would invite a girl to his place, and split the next morning, leaving her in his bed? be careful. the revenge of the dumped might be to squat in the dumper's apartment (and this is real estate terminology, not scatological).

that they are morons, indeed, is proven by the reference to their inability to remember the name of a person that has spent the entire night with them. most everyone i know, including my cat, recalls the name of a visitor, a guest. and my cat has better manners.

as if to underscore the rather low mental abilities of these morons, the writer (whom one will not dignify with his name) now builds up their sexual prowess, their studliness, with such emphatic words and images as "12 deep" and "the pounding". clearly his moronic audience has such poor self-imagery that such crude support is required in order to get it up.

we now get into territory that is clearly anti-feline, because when i read this aloud to my cat, who is a very intelligent young man, he laughed himself sillier than he ever did on catnip. don't "raw dog" it? yeah, okay. but it goes beyond that. who began as a "swan" has clearly, in his estimation, degenerated into first a victim, then a slut, a "stage five clinger", a broad, and a gonorrhea-riddled, heartless "hood rat".

yo, dawg, wrap your tool before one of the cuties grabs the hammer from your hand and brains you with it. because there is something you clearly do not yet know: women stick together. you think you are inflicting a "walk of shame" on your victim?

i'm betting that the walk of shame has been yours, boy, ever since you published this stupid, ridiculous, offensive piece of "*rap".

you live in the united states, which protects your freedom to say whatever you want, to publish whatever drivel drools from your infantile mouth. i wouldn't sanction you, boy. i would give you, your name, and your idiotic, sophomoric twaddle as wide a publication as possible, so that everyone, everywhere, will know what motivates you and what your morals are, though i am sure that your parents by now have disowned you, changed their names and moved to springfield to be near a more upright man, homer simpson.

by the way, you ruthless, shameless tool, thanks for providing your picture. i haven't had this good a laugh in a very long time.


c2009 bluemlein.blogspot.com

Labels: , , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home