Sunday, November 13, 2016

dear Michael, dear Allan . . .

Michael Moore and Prof. Allan Lichtman, you suggest that DingDongDon won't finish his first presidential term - and that someone - the veep Michael Pence, one supposes - would complete it for him.

Don't applaud that idea, that would be foolish. DingDongDon at least is not so decidedly against abortion, for example. Pence's law required that aborted or miscarried fetuses be buried or cremated. He will gleefully throw Roe v. Wade "[on]to the ash heap of history where it rightly belongs".

Having had no such procedure, ever, the man can't possibly understand the complex emotions and accommodations a woman must deal with, frequently because of a medical reason but always a painful event. His stance is a paternalistic "damn you!" aimed at the people who constitute more than half of the population. It's the old white patriarch giving it one last kick at the can to punish the 'little woman'. You want to see the US swan-dive into oblivion? You can't have Penceian thinking in there.

Incidentally, the sane mind of a Black woman, U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Walton Pratt, prevailed and suspended the law the day before it was to come into effect

But the main focus here is Mr Dump.

Let's make no mistake here - I have loathed DingDongDon since first I knew anything of him, decades ago, and have been warning of him and his demeaning neo-fascist, Hitlerian-style bluster.

His rabble-rousing before the nomination process was fatuous self-advertisement. DingDongDon is a shell - a man who has known since his formative years that there is no 'there' there, if one may borrow a phrase - who has tried out a number of vulgar personas tailored to his audiences, none of which has satisfied his ego, because his ego is so vastly deficient that nothing - not all hundreds of personas at once - can fill it.

He ran because he found adulation from a previously untapped quarter; the more cable and corporate news media covered him, the fatter his head, the more foul the rhetoric, the greater the crowd. And that crowd rolled over like a defeated dog and presented its proverbials to someone who was not even a partisan. Sayonara, Republicans.


DingDongDon now looks stunned by the fact that he's won and now can't party, stay at home taking it easy on weekends, run his businesses via secret knowledge imparted to him in the White House, be swept with waves of adulation etc. He's discovered that he is not a rock star, after all, but a poorly educated, inarticulate self-centred gob of entitlement who has seen the future and realized that its ugly, multiplicitous, virulent head is staring him down.

You had best hope that some sanity prevails and keeps the ship at least generally on the course upon which it was set by Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who clearly understood that the only society that actually works is one that includes everyone in the receipt of its bounty and its obligations, and that the States could survive only if it were united, not exploiting all but caring for all.

This election, tossing out all sense and civil discourse, was a conscious, deliberate repudiation of all things collegial and societal, and a brutal return to the US's deepest tap-root, me-ism. This me-ism produces a flower toxic to its milieu.

Sorry, fellas, this cake is for DingDongDon only
And the promised reward - that great, fat sweet cake just for you - is a mirage, an ignis fatuus that keeps one from seriously thinking of one's fellow citizens except as competitors, that does its job well, namely to prevent the steepening of taxes on the rich with the mostly-false promise that you, too, can be a billionnaire. (It used to be millionnaire, but they're as common as muck.)

Unlike Canada, which I am happy to call home and which values all (even if some of us must be given much more respect than previously shown), the US is - always has been - about the individual. The concept that a united society goes forward more easily than that of the individualist seems lost on many of its constituents.

The would-be separatists, reactionaries, racists, fascists, neoNazis, White Power idjits, and others rarin to march on Washington singing Dixie have waited for a moment such as this. The fact that authority seems not to be moved to arrest any of them on any number of valid charges only underscores the unpalatable fact that no authority charged DingDongDon with anything such as incitement to riot, spreading hate speech etc.

Those are not "politically correct" crimes, they are crimes that strike against the foundations of a society. This storm will not quickly blow itself out. That should also be kept in mind when advocating that the Electors give the presidency to Hillary. Doing that is guaranteed to start another civil war.

Will civil authority actually be able to keep the peace when the situation runs out of control?

All the secret sympathizers - the ones who never wanted anyone other than themselves to have a piece of the cake, but didn't outright say so - are sharpening their weapons, having heard the call to arms, the 'okay' to be as mean and rude and vulgar and nasty as they can be. They will now come out of the woodwork.

It bodes ill for us all.


 
©Daisy Morant 2016

Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, November 02, 2016

dear America . . .



I am Canadian. For decades I’ve had a variety of feelings – largely admiration – about your country, your society, your boundless energy and inventiveness. 

For me there is no gain by your electing either a single-minded political person whose focus, whose entire goal, has been to be president, but whom you find cold and rehearsed and possibly guilty of hubris in her assumptions, or an offensive, inarticulate, overbearing, lying, cheating and venal buffoon who thinks he can lead your country, attend to all your competing needs, just because he wants to.

They will not affect me, the recent acts by the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, who thinks you are all gullible enough to believe that his motivations are honour and justice.

You are clearly more intelligent than to believe that his jumping on the political process, at this late and crucial date, is not partisan. 
 
That, in announcing that there may be more “Clinton emails” (relating to a “scandal” he himself dismissed earlier this year as not being criminal) he did not consider that he was stirring the pot in order to favour Trump? 

That he had no ulterior motive in sitting on information unfavourable to Trump?

That he is disingenuous when he says checking these emails will take a long and careful time? He can download free software to help him out  as he clearly doesn’t know these programs exist.

Why, George W. Bush, even "Dubya" senses that "somethin in the milk ain't clean". He was frequently criticized, by me and many others,but I do not believe that his silence on Trump is any form of retaliation for Trump's merciless schadenfreude during the presidential primaries.
 
Even Bill Weld of the Libertarian party, a former Republican governor of Massachusetts now running for vice-president, sees the opportunistic and shameful actions for what they are.


And you are too smart to see the FBI document dump this weekend, on a Twitter account dormant over a year, as anything other than the further muddying of water.

Indeed, you are smart and aware enough to know that these are seditious acts by someone with a partisan affiliation to the intended candidate. Though he claimed earlier this year he no longer was a Republican . . . 


They are not quite treasonous, the FBI director’s actions, but they are seditious – seeking to overthrow the natural balance that has been arrived at over the course of the election. They are seditious because, in barfing up irrelevant documents 15 years old, with no direct relevance to Hillary Clinton, they taint the waters in favour of Donald Trump . . . to whose party he belongs.

There have been a lot of allegations by Trump concerning a “rigged election”. As in rigged by Clinton. I always discounted this idea. The actual elective process of your country (as is ours) is intensely scrutinized by officials appointed to this duty.

But now I see that it is the Republicans’ hands – tiny or not – that are all over the threats, the lies, the duplicity, the offensive actions of voter intimidation slapped down by a federal judge.

My cousin lives in Texas and works at a sheriff’s department. She believes in God, motherhood and the Constitution. She is so thoroughly Republican she believes wholeheartedly that all the evil machinations are wrought by “the other side”, Clinton is the Antichrist and Trump her god and saviour – of what, I don’t exactly know. . . AK47-totin to the ice cream parlour, perhaps? huntin’n’shootin illeeegel immigrunts after Church?

So I must take my leave of you; I can’t accept as global leader a country so blind to its faults, so determinedly wanting to win at all costs that civility, the rule of law, the rights of a person to vote, a clear and level playing field, acceptance of the fact that one’s society changes, all of these honourable situations are tossed out the window.

It’s been . . . interesting knowing you. But I no longer know who you are. Do you?


Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, June 07, 2016

The Star's apology would be a start




The Toronto Star's extraordinary silence on the messy aftermath of bottomless despair and hormones gone wrong in its own bailiwick, requires someone to make a whole lot of noise.

The Star, one of my old berths in another millennium, is, after all, the pursuer of scandal and wrongdoing everywhere, as long as it can be related to Toronto.
Raveena Aulakh - Stern.de

Yet The Star has maintained granite silence on the "love triangle" gone bad that resulted in a young woman, by all accounts a terrific investigative reporter, committing suicide.
If this had happened at Dairy Queen or The Globe and Mail or Canada Post "Mother" Star would vent her righteous wrath in 80-point type above the fold.

The story is rank and rotten.
Managing Editor Jane Davenport, who was moved out of the newsroom on Monday by Star management, was sleeping with/"shtupping"/having an affair - you name it - with the Sports Editor, Jon Filson. Filson apparently is well-known for his activities, marriages etc.
In May 2015, National Editor Stephanie Cesca went to Davenport to complain about Filson's behaviour and maltreatment of staff. Davenport said nothing. Cesca was sacked, two months later, without cause. She hired a lawyer and walked away with a settlement.
Jane Davenport - David Cooper photo
In October 2015, Filson was made editor of the tablet, the Star's effort to remain in business online.

As he was having his dance with Davenport, Filson also was having an affair with Reporter Raveena Aulakh.

Earlier this year Aulakh discovered exchanges of raunchy, graphic emails between Filson and Davenport and complained to Lynn McAuley, the Star's Foreign Editor, who, if Frank is correct, ought to be next on the sacking line.
McAuley, according to the magazine, sent Aulakh away with the horrified reaction "Don't say anything, Jane would lose her job!"

Raveena Aulakh committed suicide last month.

The Star has had its mouth sewn up ever since, unlike its reaction to the suicide of Ken Adachi, a former literary critic who killed himself after being accused of plagiarism. Then, the paper ran a voluble, regretful, elegiac obit the very next day. Ah, but:
Jon Filson - Twitter

1- Adachi was a man
2- Adachi had been around a long time and had a huge reputation
3- Audachi was not ensnared as Aulakh was.

Filson was sacked; Davenport has been sacked, and still there is no comment. The Star would report on this if it occurred in any other place of business:


A predatory male middle-management type known for his restless member
has an affair with his superior (who should know better) and a much junior staffer. He crosses lines in both directions. His superior crosses the line. The junior staffer ought know better, except that she is young and inexperienced in the wiles of those predatory types.

She is given no succour by an intermediary, who is concerned not for her well-being but for that of the honcho - "she would lose her job" oh sob! oh what a wretched story and what shameful behaviour on the part of so self-righteous a company. May you go down in flames, "Ma", for this.

Labels: , , ,

Sunday, February 07, 2016

Men's Hands

 There's currently a lot of mention of men's hands - well, a specific man's hand - being put in places where it does not belong.

Not during any sort of intimacy, I don't think you can call the following moments of intimacy no matter how much you try to stretch to meanings to fit.

These occurred in public spaces, with other people present. Invasions of privacy by men's hands.
These are the unserious ones, ones that I brushed off because nothing came of them - tho not as far as the abuser was concerned - and because I felt I had got some satisfaction from embarrassing the culprit, tho they occurred at a time when I would have been laughed out of the police station. I bring you the 1970s.

 When the Eaton Centre opened there were packed crowds on the escalators going up and down. My sister was with me. As we were halfway up to the next floor I felt someone repeatedly brush my posterior. I yelled loudly "get your hand off my ass!" and the idjit turned as red as I was. Nobody reacted. Nobody said "if you did that to my daughter I'd punch your lights out" or variation thereof. He slunk off on the next floor. Quickly. Idjit 0 - Personal Integrity 1




Sitting on the St. Clair streetcar just west of Avenue road; rush hour; I was reading the paper when it felt as though the paper were scratching my leg. I looked down: the jack ass beside me was drawing circles on my knee! with his finger! working his way up the thigh! . . . I pulled my knees together and flung them apart as fast as I could, j.a. went flying almost all the way out of the seat, got up and exited at the next stop; the man beside our row, hanging onto the rod, smiled at this. He did not grab j.a. and demand "why'd you do that to her?" or even something as selfish as "don't you know you  are giving the rest of us a bad name?" No. Probably went home, told the guys about it, and had a good laugh. JA 0 - Personal Integrity 1

 By the lobby escalators of the Globe and Mail. A sort of friend; one of the guys on the rim, someone I had spoken to many times, about many things. I'm just coming off the down escalator when he's there, begins to talk to me, and suddenly he is running his hand over my breast! Daytime! People in the lobby!
People on the escalator! I glared at him, ferociously, thinking I might want to yell bloody murder in a second; he went away, quickly. Returned later to say
he didn't know what had come over him, sorry. Blah Blah. Blah. I never spoke to him again. He died. Nobody said at the time, "Why are you putting your hand there, mac?" or "jeez, buddy, you're waaaay out
of line" MK 0 - Personal Integrity 1


Sadly, though I was a fully functioning adult, I did not go to Clark Davey's office and tell him that one of his prize guys had just gone beyond decency.  Nor did I tell my friend Richard (Brig. Malone - publisher of the mighty mop&pail), though I did challenge him several times to put bureaux across the country. At the time the Globe called itself "Canada's national newspaper" but had only sporadic reports from most major cities (yes, Virginia, there is life outside Mon/Tor/Van)  Journalism 1 - Personal Integrity 0 curious, eh?





my 1977 section front

This is not even counting the numbers of times I was subjected to obscene phone calls - tho there is one that is simply too funny to omit in any recitation of transgressions: On my bump line at Transport Canada public affairs, one midweek afternoon about 2:30 p.m. This number was known only to journalists and public servants. When I picked it up I could already hear him, on the other end, reciting his lines. Must've dialled at random. You don't suppose it was one of them, do you?

Yes, that one's got a comical edge. But the rest of it is simply unpleasant, improper, unwarranted, thoughtless, disgusting invasions of personal space (before one's sex even comes into it.) by men who let their hormones do their thinking for them. Don't anyone try again, tho. Next time I will use my fist.


(c)2016 Daisy Morant


Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, February 05, 2016

Sweet Marie . . .

Dear Marie

You strike me as someone who would never allow a sexual partner to smack you, even in fun (tho it is fun only to the smacker, not the smackee). I could be wrong about that, but it is the image you project.

Your client is in his maturity - so are you. You know how to read people, so does he. He would no more try his behaviour with an equally mature woman, because by that time women - most women - have a sense of whom to stay away from.

I am not a psychiatrist, neither are you. But a psychiatrist probably would tell you - as some have said, since this came to light - that your client deliberately dated young women of "lower status" because he could get away with unacceptable behaviours.

We who have lived for a bit know that only a weak-assed jerk with neurotic obsessions about his identity, security and status would not allow a mature partner to see his true self.

No, Marie. You, and I, and all the women I know who are mature, can smell his sort. If ever he got close enough to smack us we would smack him right back. He knows it. So do you.

But those other women, young women, sheltered women, soft and reticent women, who haven't been exposed to someone like your client, who may be somewhat in awe of this self-created "media god", won't know.

Won't know how to react.

Won't think that going to police is the only way to put paid to the activities of anyone who smacks around women in fun. 

His fun.

By the way, Marie, it doesn't matter how "good" their memory isn't, how they behaved afterward, or that there is some confusion so long after he event.

What matters is that an obnoxious, egotistical, ego-driven, narcissistic older man selected young women, and punched or slapped or otherwise stepped over the line.

That line is there. We who keep pointing out to other women that it's there, we keep refreshing it. We have to.

We know you are "just doing your job". But your utter disdain, your distaste of the man is writ large for all to see.


(c)2016 Daisy Morant

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, December 10, 2015

Golden Words From Chris Herbert


Chris Herbert was just a young Brit soldier until the day his leg was blown off by a roadside bomb in Basra, Iraq, in 2007.

What followed was clearly a protracted and, at times, frustrating experience. Surgery, rehab, stares etc.
So when a Great White Whale(sorry, whales, this doesn't reflect on you) of an idiot recently opened his maw to spew out what he thought was ambergris, but which we all recognized as stinking, putrid hate speech, a lot of people assumed that Mr Herbert would support the blubber's fatuous idiocies.

But let me turn the column over to Mr Herbert, whose words are gold:

"Getting frustrated by some people expecting racism from me, because I got blown up. Yes. A Muslim man blew me up, and I lost my leg.
A Muslim man also lost his arm that day wearing a British Uniform.
A Muslim medic was in the helicopter that took me from the field
A Muslim surgeon performed the surgery that saved my life
A Muslim Nurse was part of the team that helped me when I returned to the UK
A Muslim Healthcare Assistant was part of the team that sorted out my day to day needs in rehabilitation when I was learning to walk
A Muslim taxi driver gave me a free ride the first time I went for a beer with my Dad after I came home.
A Muslim doctor offered my Dad comfort and advice in a pub, when he didnt know how to deal with my medicines and side effects.

Contrary to that,
A white brit spat in my girlfriends face for ‘fucking a cripple when you could have me [him]’
A White brit pushed my wheelchair away from a lift so he could use it first.
A White brit screamed at my Dad for parking in a disabled bay when I was in the services coming home
(Although, alot of people helped in my recovery! I dont hate white brits either! hahaha)
Point is, fuck off. I know who I dislike, and I know who I dont. I know who I appreciate, and I know who I dont. If you want to hate an entire race of men and women for the actions of a few dickheads feel free, but don’t push your views on me, thinking I am an easy target because one douchebag decided it was my day to die.
Blaming all Muslims for the actions of groups like Daeshe and the Taliban, is like blaming all Christians for the actions of the KKK or Westboro Baptist Church.
Get a grip of your lives, hug your family and get back to work."

Thank you, Chris. 

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, December 03, 2015

Stinky Red Herring at Forcillo Trial


Sammy Yatim and his mother, Sahar Bahadi, in Montreal

Currently James Forcillo, a Metro Toronto police constable, in on trial for second-degree murder in the July 2013 death of Sammy Yatim. Yatim, an 18-year-old undergoing a crisis on a TTC streetcar, was shot by Forcillo nine times within 50 seconds of Forcillo's arrival at the scene.

A couple of weeks ago I was preoccupied and had only one ear on the news, but heard - in the thirty seconds or so of modern TV reportage, minimal time/maximum repetition - that it was suggested police did not just close the streetcar doors and let Yatim cool off, because there might have been others on the streetcar. . .in other words, they - all of them, swarming around the stricken vehicle like ants around a dead bird - considered the possibility of hostages. Another unfortunate modern buzzword.

This bothered me.

That evening the event was presented first as a dangerous hostage situation, soon clarified, soon "defused" in modern police fashion by shooting dead the creep threatening society.

And it seemed to be the case. Then other videos surfaced, including one from the side street, showing a different picture, a lone young man visible briefly in the open doors before being mowed down by three, then another six, shots. The unnecessary murder of the teenager. The further erosion of trust in the police. Demonstrations, and the eventual murder charge against Forcillo, who had shown himself to be too overreactive, with an itchy trigger finger.

But there were no hostages, so why that reference in court?

After some digging, here we are:

it transpires that on Nov. 19, 2015, Forcillo's lawyer Peter Brauti was dismissively cross-examining and ridiculing a Crown witness. Robert Warshaw is an American former police chief who now specializes in reforming police departments with problems of excessive force. He had testified that Forcillo ignored many options to defuse the situation.

As in The Star:

"Forcillo and the other officers on scene were also concerned about a potential hostage situation if Yatim was not the only one on the streetcar, Brauti said."

Back in July 2013 I wondered why the shooting had occurred. It would have been supremely easy to close the doors and pull down the trolley, deactivating the electrics and leaving the streetcar there with Yatim in it. It was late at night, there was little traffic on Dundas Street.

But Brauti wanted to throw in the red and stinky herring of "potential hostage[s]". Nothing like a bit o' fish to confound the jury, eh? Therefore the suggestion of "hostages".

In case Brauti has not examined all the videos available online I refer him to this one:

unedited Caplin Grey video


a fifteen-minute, unedited video taken by Caplin Grey, which shows, roughly around the 1:12 minute mark, an officer exiting its rear doors after, presumably, checking to see who else was on board with Yatim.

No one there, no hostages. The stink lingers.


©2015 Daisy Morant



Labels: , , ,

Friday, November 06, 2015

A Canadian Ceremony


Justin Trudeau and Friends arriving at Governor-Generals' house 2015 (Fram Dinshaw photo)


Someone asked me what I thought of the coverage of the swearing-in ceremonies of Justin Trudeau as Prime Minister of Canada and his cabinet.

The impression many people came away with was of something akin to a coronation—heard that term more than a few times.

That's not so.
We aren't that dull a country that we can't have our own version of what, in the large, self-fixated body to the south of us really does seem like a coronation, complete with prayers and flyovers and salutes and such, with hundreds of thousands of people crowding Washington's pleasant streets.
Not like Washington - President Obama's inauguration

And compared to an actual coronation—even in the Twentieth century an obsolete, outright archaic set of rituals that held meaning only for about a thousand people who were edified by their role in the ceremony and understood easily-missed gestures, while impressing the hell out of everyone else—it was more like an afternoon tea with the new neighbours.

1902: Crawling to King Edward VII's Feet in Fealty - painting by John Henry Francis Bacon
All right, so we don't particularly care for the hocus-pocus choreographed by a court at times desperate to prove its legitimacy to its British subjects (yes, subjects, not citizens).
and not like the United Kingdom 1952: Elizabeth II's coronation procession

Kudos for using antique leftovers from earlier reigns. And turning it into a tourist attraction—brilliant stroke if not to one's taste.

The Tourists, Oh The Tourists! (Alessandro Casagrande photo)


And maybe we also don't care to have the American way, with its sharp divisions between the branches rolled out like a turkey wrap in the very religion that is not permitted to taint the government.

The ceremony was Canadian. No fawning peons, no militaristic showoff.  Tho unlike every other swearing-in it was open to the public.



Men in Suits - Pierre Trudeau and several of his Cabinet, 1968 (The Canadian Press photo)
And if a senior journalist lost his objectivity for a while and was seen to drool over the access provided to him, let's be forgiving. It's been an unpleasant decade for journalists, scientists . . . nearly everyone. Now the windows are open and fresh air is sweeping through.


Between sighs of relief and the afterglow of the election, there is just one thing we should bear in mind. Currently there are impossibly high expectations, driven by the conclusion of the election campaign and the realization that one doesn't have to be like Communist Russia north of the 45th.

The fact that the PM, a couple of party leaders and a number of premiers will be out of the country for a while can only be good in allowing the media focus to fall on other subjects. Journalists, especially media who publish their opinions for pay—should give this government a fair chance as they have done for every other government. This one is different only in that we now live in an obnoxiously wired world where every faux pas is immortalized. There is a learning curve for everyone. I don't agree with people who think that being a cabinet minister requires a long political road to that job. That can cause one to become dull and insensitive.

Sometimes one has to engage in lateral thinking and bring wildly different perspectives and experience to the table. That's what happened here, on Wednesday. Let's stand back and wait to see what these talented and worldly people can produce. If they fail it won't be the end of the world—they'll be replaced and someone else will tackle the job at hand.


(c)2015 Daisy Morant

Labels: ,

Sunday, November 01, 2015

A Mighty Weight Off our Shoulders. . .


Justin Trudeau, St. Catharines MP Chris Bittle, dishing out biscuits at Cafe Gatti, St Catharines, Ont.


"Great persons are able to do great kindnesses" Miguel de Cervantes,  Don Quixote

One generally likes to envision one's leader as a great person, but we in Canada have done without for far too long.

In the aftermath of the federal election there has been a lot of anger from the losing side, who have sat at the feet of their idol Stephen Harper, and who feel that the winners somehow robbed them, and who believe that every journalist is a pinko Liberal-supporting crook who should keep his mouth shut.

Those who excoriate the media should bear in mind that most of the news media in Canada - not just print - now is under corporate ownership and most were obligated by their corporate owners to editorialize in support of paranoid egomaniac Stephen Harper in the election just past. We saw such stupidities as the Globe and Mail, which long called itself Canada's National Newspaper while it had not a single bureau west of Toronto, supporting the Conservatives - but they could not bring themselves to add Harper to the mix.

Individual journalists are not automatically on the liberal end of the spectrum but one's occupation requires one to be skeptical and not to take "news" handouts or pronouncements of authority for granted. It was that way when I began many decades ago and it continues, even though individuals who are more right-of-centre are more likely to be hired by corporate media.

Harper is not a "nice" man; his double-dealings to become leader of the merged Conservative Party of Canada and the Reform Alliance were quite convoluted - leaving David Orchard and Preston Manning in the dust. Considering that this created a party with clout it was obviously acceptable in many party members' eyes. But that does not mean that journalists and commentators could not do so - and they did. If you don't like that I'm sorry but it is part of the job.

While he shed Manning like a snake writhing out of its useless skin, he managed to retain a number of Reform characteristics. As per Orchard: "Manning's so-called Canadian Alliance attempts to import directly from the United States a brand of right-wing evangelism, package it with a Canadian name and declare the product to be Canadian conservatism". . . Harper was not just successful but conscientious in using those tactics, as he was successful in hiding his evangelical leanings.

I read an article, years ago, Harper had written when he was young and currying favour in order to consolidate his support; he sounded sane and coherent, had a persuasive point, and I actually thought here is someone with whom I might like to work. Seeing his performance certainly set me straight. I'd rather dance with a cobra.

Orchard quoted Edmund Burke's definition of a conservative "[having] A disposition to preserve and an ability to improve."

But Harper did not fit that definition - rather, he exhibited decidedly stalinist leanings in his need to micro-control absolutely everything. Oh, he restrained himself fairly well until he had a majority but then - like a girdle unsuccessfully trying to contain a 300-pound person - he flew out in all directions at once. What many Canadians did not immediately understand was Harper's millennialism, his apocalyptic  vision which - as with many of his ideas - was imported from the U.S. and his proprietary sense - that Canada belonged to him and was his to do with as he pleased: secret arms deals, secret trade deals, outsized focus on the energy sector, with job-crushing reaction to the oil slump.


Troubling: his paranoia-riven personality erupted, unchecked, in such idiocy as building huge new prisons when the crime rate was clearly going down. Prisons that remain empty, because, in order to present a "balanced budget" before the election, the Correctional Service of Canada's budget was curtailed.  By institutionalizing mandatory minimum sentences for relatively small crimes he was arrogating to himself the power of judges to apply their discretion, based on the evidence heard in their court. The Ontario Court of Appeal struck down mandatory minimums as being unconstitutional. Like the insanely obstinate robot in the Terminator he dusted himself off and was at it again before the election, intending to introduce mandatory minimums for fraud.  He surrounded himself with largely third-rate MPs. People who would not squawk too much when they watched the cost of a discredited aircraft, the F-35, rise into the stratosphere. Again, the need to micro-manage. And he trashed the reputation of Canada abroad.

More troubling: his often stated intent to annihilate the Liberal Party, the Constitution, and Justin Trudeau. That someone so fixated on destruction of an idea would surround himself with equally rabid sycophants and put in place unconstitutional and illegal mechanisms to further this goal was frightening - the sort of behaviour we have deplored for a century in countries and leaders that we collectively abhor. In preparation for this year's elections, Harper raided the contingency reserve and claimed a "balanced budget".

Even more troubling: the denial of science, the denial of one's right to one's own ideas, the denial of science by suppression of scientific facts, the muzzling of an entire public service that serves the country, not the party, cancelling the long-form census, thereby denying the use of facts in assessing societal needs, and aligning unequivocally with a man who has cynically used paranoia to drive some citizens of Israel to unseemly callousness - firebombing a sleeping family with young children, killing the father and their son, and accepting that as an appropriate punishment for people who had done no wrong to anyone. Blatantly stole material such as photos from websites and repurposed them without permission. That he double-crossed the veterans of this country seemed not to give him any sleepless nights, despite his using their existence as a hook for his base, when expedient. Over all, when confronted with previously published quotes of ideas he was trying to hide, he simply denied them.


Entirely unacceptable: Illegality and Amorality. Voter suppression, robocalls, misdirection ...he could put Machiavelli to shame, he could. Harper imported the underhanded and frequently amoral, possibly illegal tactics of the American rabid right, the truthers and the Tea Partiers. The electorate did not know about this until it began coming to light in the Cons' majority government, when Harper created a Constitutional crisis by proroguing Parliament twice, named senators who were ineligible because they did not live in their province - and whose spending was on a shocking level. One of those - former TV frontman Mike Duffy, was secretly paid off by "universally respected"  Nigel Wright, Harper's then-chief of staff, who claimed, in court, under oath, that Harper knew nothing. If that's the case, the micromanager clearly lost his grip. Pass the salt - buckets of it. He was the only Canadian prime minister ever found to be in contempt of Parliament, misspent millions of public dollars on trashing Trudeau and maintaining a 24/7 media studio documenting his "achievements" - which will be lost for a long time in the wave of contempt that has now swept him out into the doldrums.

His shocking lack of response in defending the rights of Canadians incarcerated abroad rankled, as did his sniffy delineation of "old-stock Canadians" somehow more entitled than immigrants, with no regard whatsoever for our indigenous peoples. Well, he does trace his line back to an immigrant to the Atlantic provinces in the 1700s - but ask any Native person how old stock that makes him.

That there were well over one thousand missing and murdered Aboriginal women seemed not to disturb his arrogant persona; note that these figures may be higher but they are legitimate, being provided by the RCMP. It was cutesy-poo that he liked cats, going so far as to transform part of leaky, energy-starved, unkempt 24 Sussex Drive into a cat sanctuary, but as an old stock Canadian he couldn't give a damn about those women or their families.

He attacked a Supreme Court judge when all she did was point out that a nominee for the court was not qualified. I have no doubt that he - who, in a prior decade, railed against "MPs' gold-plated pensions" - will not be an honourable man and refuse the pension as per his oft-stated "principles". Three years ago, a reader in Lotus land - as Canadians affectionately call British Columbia - expressed his conviction that Harper would end them. Turns out that when he saw the figure - $224,000 per annum for the remainder of his life - burning into the paper he'd written it on, he salivated so hard he put the fire out.

Journalist Michael Harris enumerated the repellent turns Harper took in his nearly-500-page book Party of One. Near the end, feeling begrimed by it all, he visited the legendary writer Farley Mowat, who told him "“Stephen Harper is probably the most dangerous human being ever elevated to power in Canada,” "

Not only did he ignore the provinces for years, starving them of tax resources that were rightly theirs, but he cutely told Newfoundland Premier Danny Williams “You’re not going to fuck with my country.” context: beginning at 9m50s.

Internally and externally, Canada became somewhat of a joke, not as innocuous as it might sound - we had become "Harperland".  And in response to Harper's pervasive contempt, Canadians who did not like the outline of Harperland began to make their distaste known. Even the usually astute Andrew Coyne wondered at the time why the reaction to Harper was so out of proportion - it wasn't, really.

By the time this interminable election campaign, clearly designed to bankrupt the Liberal party, began, his constant pronouncements of half-truths and attacks on divisive issues was raising numerous flags. And his supercilious, dripping-with-oil use of "friends", interspersed every few paragraphs in his speeches, became an irritant even my clearly conservative friends wanted to mute. A recap of his regime, a blight on our history, was published in The Atlantic Monthly when it still appeared that there might be a three-way tie.

But the gods smiled upon us


No one is claiming that Trudeau is a gift from Olympus, though he is rather more attractive that Harper, whose fixed half-smile and beady eyes expressed his inner being to the outer world. Trudeau is young and optimistic, open and inclusive. He will be beholden to some interests, as is anyone who reaches that lofty goal. He will make mistakes - that is a fact of life. But he will never behave as irrationally as Harper did; he simply does not have that disposition.

But the point is not about who is liberal, conservative, libertarian or just plain Con.  It is that Harper's failings were of such a magnitude that the country ejected him in a life-or-death spasm, a Heimlich manoeuvre, if you will, so that we can breathe again and begin to undo the strangling strands of his distrust as expressed in recent law.


 (c)2015 Daisy Morant

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, September 17, 2015

Submit! Submit I Say!

. . . just not under a pseudonym and just not without telling the intended publication that you are using a nom de plume. . . .

The upshot of the "Best Poem of 2015" fiasco, and the unmasking of  the "Chinese-American" Yi-Fen Chou as  surly-faced, balding Frustrated and Angry White Guy -Middle-Aged American Michael Derrick Hudson - seems to be that one is not permitted to have an in"appropriate[d]" persona for publication - take that, George Eliot! and Acton Bell!  and George Sand! and Isak Dinesen!

Anne Knish! stay in the bakery, btw! Deanna Dwyer! Madeleine Brent!  Edith Van Dyne! get out of those pages, they're for men only!  Henry Handel Richardson!  John Sedges! Lorenzo Da Ponte! Diedrich Knickerbocker! use your real name or sign up for therapy!

Go back to fiddling with keys and kites, especially during thunderstorms, Martha Careful! Polly Baker! Alice Addertongue! Caelia Shortface! Silence Dogood! and Busy Body! Oh No, Onoto Watanna! you can't adopt a Japanese identity, not even if you're half Chinese and half Canadian (the most inclusive society on the planet, despite its current jackboot-shod CRAP [Conservative Reform Alliance Party] leader trampling on our Constitution) Rhys Bowen! Robin Hobb! Sue Denim! Vera Haij! up against the wall! who the hell are you!?

The above are instances in which there has been a definite 21st-century no-no: "misappropriation", cultural or other, in most cases either sex or nationality have been cribbed from elsewhere. What is it about the fever pitch with which this act is "debated"? (One can't really debate or discuss nay longer, a twitter storm is liable to fly up one's nose and blow the top off one's head before one can say I'm not Martha Careful - he is!)

I am not getting into that debate here except to say that the more facts are at hand, the fewer people seem to believe. Thank you, internet.

I am sick unto death of  jabberings about who owns what and why, whether there is a lot of back-patting by writers/editors who submit to one another's publications, whether "approximately 99 % of  the poets are professors" (Best Poems of 2015 editor Sherman Alexie, weighing in on having been had by the aforementioned FAWG).

But I want to make one point that should satisfy everyone and level the playing field at the same time.

All submissions - whether for inclusion, for a grant, for a prize competition - all submissions should be blind. Should have one intermediate step in which the author is given a randomly generated number by someone not involved in the judging at all. That way no tender sensibilities will be scoured, feathers ruffled etc. And Sherman Alexie can forget he ever said that he paid closer attention to the poem because of the "Chinese-American" name and "I tossed the poem on the "maybe" pile that eventually became a "yes" pile".

How about it? The only point of contention would be when #H. A. L. 9000" is unmasked as a machine.




(c)2015 Daisy Morant


Labels: ,

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

Der Leader's Excellent Accomplishments

Kiss me - I mean, Trust Me!
You're young, you live in Canada you will be voting in October.  Maybe you've not voted before, or you are wondering why there should be a change at the top when the talking heads in Ottawa - at least those on the government benches - tell us all that everything is great.

So that you can appreciate the importance of your voice, let's see what Der Leader has done since he's been in office - the first lot consists of scandals, assembled by TheTyee.ca -http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2015/08/10/Harper-Abuses-of-Power-Final/ - where you can find details for each, and to whom I am eternally grateful.



The second lot, which is not complete, is provided by Andrew Coyne - http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/andrew-coyne-you-will-be-shocked-to-see-who-is-on-stephen-harpers-full-enemy-list - of the National Post (strange, but true, considering the Post's wide blue stripe, and shockingly true, given Mr Coyne's previously admiring perception of Der Leader.)

SECTION I.
ABUSING PARLIAMENT:
SABOTAGE, SCANDALS, CORRUPTION AND CONTEMPT

PMO Tied to Senate Hush Money Scandal

Harper Found in Contempt of Parliament

Against Court Order, Refusal to Share Budget Info

Conservative Cabinet Staffers Granted Immunity from Testimony

Conservatives Falsify Reports and Documents

Repeated Duplicity in Afghan Detainees Controversy

Repeated Duplicity on Costing of F-35 Fighter Jets

Harper Minister Lies, Blames Statistics Canada for Killing Long Form Census

Conservative MP Admits He Lied to Parliament

Conservative House Leader Admits to Mockery of Question Period

Harper Maligns the Supreme Court Chief Justice

Conservatives Engage in Abuse of Process with Omnibus Bills.

Harperites Deliberately Sabotage, Stymie Committee System

Harper's Own MPs Protest Muzzling

Conservative Bill Rewrites History to Protect Mounties from Potential Criminal Charges

Harper Minister Caught in Advertising Scam with Public Funds

Corrupt Conservative Cronies

Access to Information System Impeded

The Silencing of the Public Service

Loyalty Oaths Imposed on Public Servants

Harper Government Sued by Justice Department Whistleblower

Conservatives Block Accreditation for Opposition MPs

Tactic Borrowed from North Korea's Dear Leader

Clampdown on Freedom of Speech of Diplomatic Corps

Aquatic Science Libraries Decimated

UN Blasts Canada's Treatment of Immigrants

Harper Government Denies Khadr Basic Rights

Illegitimate Prorogation of Parliament, Twice

Undue Interference with Independent Agencies

Billions Borrowed without Parliament's Permission

Lapdogs Appointed as Watchdogs

SECTION II:
'HARPER BRAND' ABUSES:
LIES, SPIES, AND THIS PORK SMELLS REALLY BAD

PMO Attempts to Cover up Video Leak Putting Troops at Risk

The 'Harper Government' Labelling Deception

Conservatives Place Party Logos on Government of Canada Cheques

Record Amounts of Partisan Political Advertising, on the Public Purse

Conservatives Stack Their Own Ridings with Infrastructure Funds

$50 Million Spending Deception as Documented by the Auditor General

Patronage Run Amok

Undermining Statistics Canada, Killing Data

Government Muzzles Science Community

Like Never Before, Limits Placed on Media Access

Harper's Team Tries to Ban Journalist for Asking Question

Harper Minister Sucker Punches CBC Budget

Suppression of Research

The Vic Toews Porno Smear

Harper's Fallen Soldiers Blackout

Protesters Put under Blanket Surveillance

Rights and Democracy, Other Groups, Dismantled

Harper Government Spied on Aboriginal Critic, 'Retaliated'

Revenue Canada Loosed to Attack Charities

Conservatives Use Unheard of Tactic to Force through Anti-Union Bill

Harper Smears Liberal Sikh MP, Insinuating Tie to Terrorism

Veterans' Advocates Smeared

SECTION III: 
ELECTION ABUSES:
SCAMS, SLIMES, STINGS AND CROOKED SPENDING

Conservatives Run Undercover Sting Operations

Conservative Convicted on Robocalls Scam

Harper's Ex-Parliamentary Secretary Jailed for Breaking Election Law

'Reprehensible' Dirty Tricks Campaign against Irwin Cotler

Conservatives Bar Crosbie Candidacy

Election Violations Prompt Resignation of Cabinet Member

Conservatives Attempt Election Campaign Frame-up

Harper's Office Deploys Interns for Dirty Tricks

Citizens Ejected from Conservative Rallies

Conservatives Make Campaign Event Attendees Sign Gag Order

Conservatives Unfix Their Own Fixed Date Election Law

Guilty Plea on In and Out Affair

Cons' Elections Bill Strips Power from Elections Canada

Harper Minister Smears Head of Elections Canada

Copyright Grab for Attack Ads

Conservatives Use Terrorists' Propaganda in Attack Ad

Record Use of Personal Attack Ads


SO MUCH for the abuses of power demonstrated by Der Leader (yes, a close cousin to Dear Leader of North Korea)

but now for more: selections from Der Leader's enemies list - as before, details at the link


1. The Opposition.
2. The bureaucracy.
3. The courts.
4. The Senate.
5. The media.
6. The premiers.

Moving down the list, we find:

17. Environmentalists.
29. Scientists.
46. Elections Canada.
63. The Auditor General*.
87. The Parliamentary Budget Officer*.
102. The Ethics Commissioner.
175. Their own backbench*.
209. The U.S.
217. China.
238. Europe.
245. The Wheat Board.
428. Canada’s police commissioners. See: long-gun registry.
621. The former head of Statistics Canada.
912. Mrs. Rose Fairchild, 421 Marlow Ave., Kitchener, Ontario. It’s a long story…

*Tory appointees


 (c)2015 Daisy Morant

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, August 25, 2015

By Palmyra I sat and wept . . .



Short and sweet.


The greasy and sweaty dark lards overrunning the Middle East like so much Hussein's Revenge are foul ideologues of very small mind and an apparent Freudian fixation with their adjunct appendages.  Clearly they only really feel good when decapitating, burning, drowning, blowing up or otherwise destroying (unresolved rage - Mommy never loved them!) what they can't control.

These amped-up psychotics have escaped the nursery on planet BadBoy and now run as rampant upon our earth as those weird black slugs with hard shells that tried to invade the compost bin earlier this year.

They are deluded, believing that GOD is watching them (paranoia) and approves (megalomania) of their actions. That there is only one GOD (there's not a single one) and that this GOD wants them to do this (at least you love me, Daddy, Puhleease!)

That this GOD doesn't want them to look into any mirrors (yup, they're an upchuckingly ugly bunch of ugly sods), doesn't want them to draw or use pictures of all GOD's creation (artistic ability - zero; comprehension - maybe two? minus?) and wants them to provide their sick-puppy offerings of the supposedly GODless:

the heads of the old, the young, the inbetween, the burnt offerings, the smithereens of temples, churches, carvings, drawings etc -

but they'll loot the temples, first! BAAL where the hell are you???


The sooner these miserable, pusillanimous, weak-arsed, gutless, spineless excrescences are removed, the better.

Suggestion: W. and Jeb - since your family was instrumental in the entirely illegal attacks upon Iraq, under the pretense of destroying "weapons of mass destruction" - turned out not even to be mideast poutines, but baby formula - you get your arses out there and fix it. You Republicans are always yabbering about taking responsibility, so go for it.

Just don't expect anyone to thank you for it.


(c)2015 Daisy Morant

Labels: , , , , ,

Better Late . . .

Sometimes when one has been working full-tilt for some time, it seems, the eyes cross involuntarily, the mind shuts off and does three-dimensional sudokus, and pixels and bits and such fall through the cracks of inattention.
My apologies. This blog should have been posted in November 2014. Note that I won't put pix of  RoFo, DoFo, Jian Ghomeshi on the same page with these soldiers.






This just-concluded week has been a strange confluence of personalities in Canada, when  three personality types clamoured for our attention: the graceless incompetent, the narcissistic self-promoter, and the self-effacing, duty-bound soldier ready to give his life for the country.

A lifetime ago, when everyone over 19 was suspect, 'war' was made a dirty word - as was, by extension, 'soldier', largely due to a sense that the Vietnam conflict would (and did) demand endless cannon fodder.  It did not help when National Guards in various states, called out to defend establishment assets, brought real guns shooting real bullets that killed real protesters.  But that was long ago now and one feels old merely remembering those society-rupturing days when some soldiers (and others) overstepped the line.


But no such event took place on Monday, 20 October 2014, when  Martin Couture-Rouleau deliberately drove into another man and Warrant Officer Patrice Vincent, killing the latter, because they were soldiers. Couture-Rouleau had been too impressed by rhetoric spouted by the nominally Islamic group Islamic State. IS are psychopathic bullies who have got their hands on real guns with real capabilities that would have astounded those National Guardsmen; their hatred infects people who may already be marginalized by lack of opportunity, mental illness or other factors.  Couture-Rouleau had just lost custody of his son.  He  vented his anger against the establishment by harming very obvious supporters thereof - soldiers in uniform.

On Wednesday, 22 October 2014, a young man named Nathan Cirillo, an Argyll Highlanders reservist from Hamilton, was guarding the War Memorial in Ottawa when Michael Zehaf-Bibeau shot him several times, point-blank, in the back.

The killer then entered the Parliament Buildings where he was shot by Kevin Vickers the Sergeant-at-Arms.  The killer was mentally ill, ticked off by the establishment, a loner, a drifter, a drug user who had probably no feelings of self-worth, and who did not care what happened to him, as long as he could take someone out with him.

Cpl. Cirillo did not stand a  chance, though many witnesses tried to keep him alive until modern medicine could restore him. 

Patrice Vincent was 53, a 28-year serving member of the Canadian Forces. 

Cpl. Cirillo was 24, father of a five-year-old boy, whom he was raising as a single parent.  He worked out, valued his membership in the regiment, loved his child, loved his dogs, and was unarmed when his life was taken by someone who is largely a blur.  The government is eager to use him as a poster boy for imposing draconian measures that will infringe on more of our rights. 

Zehaf-Bibeau 's mother, who loved him, and who had seen his decline, and frustration, is trying desperately to make the ruling party see, beyond their blinkered, closed minds, that he was not radicalized. Some of the IS drivel found fertile soil in his disorganized mind, with shameful consequences. But that is not radicalization.

Cpl. Cirillo's death struck us Canadians particularly hard.  He was so young. He was full of life, and happiness.  He had a plan which included serving in the Forces. His boy is so little, so elfin, bewildered, without a mother.

When Cpl Cirillo's body was driven to Hamilton traffic stopped, everywhere.  People got out of their cars, stood attentively, waved or saluted, waved flags, and cried. Grown men, old women alike, we cried for his vanished potential, for his fragile little boy - and for his dogs who wore the unmistakable visages of pain and loss and bewilderment, waiting for him who would never return.



--------



Over the weekend of 25-27 October 2014 what appeared a relatively minor, mysterious flap at the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation became dynamite, largely due to social media: the host of a very popular radio show, Jian Gomeshi, was terminated.

Gomeshi did not help matters when he posted an open letter on his Facebook page, in which he claimed a jilted lover was responsible, along with a media freelancer, for alerting CBC to his sexual proclivities which included bondage, submission, and sado-masochism.  He stressed that consent was "carefully" "negotiated", and a slew of other glib phrases that read, to this reader, like lame excuses.

He is in the media - has been a long time - which have long been discussing the limits of violence in hockey and such.  He presumably was awake and alert when the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that in hockey one can not consent to violence or harm being done to oneself.  And, the court said, this was true for any other situation, including sex.  So - tying someone up, okay; slapping, punching and such - definitely not.  Moreover the court had ruled that consent itself may be revoked at any time, that a person changing his/her mind was not bound by earlier consent.  Gomeshi may be suing CBC for a large amount of money, but clearly he has already lost many of his fans, who supported him before they read his letter. Meanwhile, charges have caught up on him and a date in court awaits.



--------




Meanwhile, on Monday, 27 October 2014, while many gabbers were hotly discussing the fate of JiGo, municipal elections were held in Toronto that brought John Tory to the seat of mayor, despite Doug Ford's attention-grabbing, mouth-foaming, head-about-to-explode campaign.

If you have been in a mine for the last year, or in the rain forests of South America, you require background: Doug Ford, a councillor, stepped in as mayoral candidate when his brother Rob Ford, current mayor, was found to have cancer requiring treatment.  And RoFo is the media-hogging drug-snorting/sniffing/swilling man who claims something called "Ford Nation" as his own. Wasn't that a car manufacturer's tagline?

There is a pathetically obsolete aura about DoFo and RoFo which might elicit sympathy, were it not for their flaming hypocrisy, their desperate public denial of private wealth, as if "saying it" were, à la Jean Picard, "making it so".

It was a telling moment when, immediately after DoFo's loss, RoFo commandeered the stage, not to issue conciliatory sentiments but a vitriolic, poisonous diatribe against "them" and a challenge to the ludicrously termed "Ford Nation" to begin the 2018 campaign to return the inept, incompetent, untruthful, drugged-out, arse-grabbing nitwit to the mayoralty.  He may have had a streak of appeal based on the boyish "aw shucks" and "gee whillikers" charm that many have claimed to have seen in him - most often when seen in contrast to his charmless "stop squawking so I can rip yer throat out" brother.  But illness and its awful consequences - drugs, pain, weight see-saws, hair loss - have squelched that guttering flame.


And there you have it.  Three types of lives... and you can determine which deserve(s) honour, and which do(es) not.

(c)2015 Daisy Morant

Labels: ,

Saturday, June 06, 2015

Transgendered? it helps to be Rich



                                                                                                                                                                                       
Annie Leibovitz image of Caitlyn (formerly Bruce) Jenner

There is a tragic dimension to this story of Bruce  - now Caitlyn - Jenner.  It is the hundreds, if not thousands, of transgendered people who do not have $100-million from which they can pay to have all hair removed, skin peeled, breasts implanted, noses straightened, eye sockets enlarged or reduced, along with eyelids, botox injections, hip implants, arse implants, dental work, sculpting whatever has been left out, wigs costing thousands of dollars made from the finest European hair, undergarments that further the illusion of shape, and clothing that enhances areas for which the same is desired.  No, most transgendered individuals don't have the money, the access to the first-rank surgeons, cosmeticians and so on.

They do not have the wherewithal to buy the best clothes that fit correctly around shoulders and hips that may still be too awkward from decades of use as males. Or the shoes that fit properly, and are stylish, and don't make they feet look like ducks' feet.They haven't money for the surgery that will remove a prominent Adam's apple - or even reduce it to unobtrusive proportions - the wish of quite a few men, even straight, who are burdened with one.



Pilot Karen Ulane* -  no surgery to reduce the Adam's apple.

They don't have the money to hire trainers and teachers and companions to assist in their transition from male to female or vice versa. They are more likely lonelier, feel more despair, know deep-down that there is a degree of delusion to turn the wish into fact. They don't eat at top-notch restaurants, don't have families of "stars" and all the attendant sycophants who will always reassure them that they look as good as they hoped, if not "perfect", a much-overused word.

They have to wait in line for surgery; in Ontario they are at the mercy of the staff at CAMH. They are humiliated by having to ask third parties to verify that they "presented as" male or female - terminology reminiscent of Biology 101. They will never skip the line, and their treatment by the media (which currently are casting a benign gaze upon the issue, where until recently it was vituperation, venom and disgust) while currently mostly positive, will change with the wind, we media types being notoriously fickle. Who knows what will be the next juicy morsel to occupy the front pages?

Yes, it is heartening to see in the Jenner story proof that we are casting aside some of the more deeply rooted prejudices. But it shows the degree to which personal wealth make a difference in the quality and nature of treatment.

All one can say is this: Do not give up hope and find strength from others


* Karen Ulane (1941-1989) deserves a big thank you: Ulane v. Eastern Airlines became the federal legal precedent for transsexual legal status under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

PS - more readable font for y'all.
(c)2015 Daisy Morant


Labels: , , , , , ,

Monday, February 23, 2015

Sleepy - But Never a Yawn

All the dirt on Sleepy Hollow (from www.tom-mison.com)
Hello FOX.

You control the purse strings on such a degree of entertainment that it must, sometimes, be difficult to keep apart the winners and the losers, even if they're on the spreadsheet.

I always wonder what motivates a network - is it all only "return on investment" in the form of viewers? The way to gather the info on who is watching hat seems rather antiquated, if a few years after my time, so I don't understand the reasoning at all. You cannot  - in raw numbers - measure the entertainment and engagement values of any given show.  It makes one wonder whether there is perhaps a bit of horse trading as well. And if so, it is not something to which the viewer is privy, unless an insider spills ye proverbial beans.

There's a vehicle called this girl, or the girl, or the dotty goofy girl - so lame, so trite, a trope redone ad nauseam here, there, and everywhere. Requires goofy girl to roll her big eyes and look cute, a bit helpless. But cute.

Why is it on the air? are there really so many more viewers who take comfort in it? is it because everything is so predictable?

Then there's Sleepy Hollow which is literally engaging in trial by fire tonight - so everyone fire up your TVs. Sleepy Hollow is more than I enumerated below - it has silliness, it sometimes over extends itself, but it is

Different

Terrifically well acted by everyone

An elastic concept that could last years, if the producers had any assurance that developing certain plots or story lines over seasons rather than episodes would not suffer death by cancellation.

An entertainment that has more than the usual lineup of cute white girl with big eyes, the standard assortment of goofy/serious/ambitious/wise-but-misunderstood white/whitish fellas, and, tucked away somewhere for the weekly dose of profundity, the Wise Old Owl, whether male, female, or anthropomorphic voice-over.

And . . . .last but not least -

it's not always squeaky clean. It is easy to underestimate the effect of a bit o' dirt, FOX. The sweaty, messy but still essentially clean hero/ine is more attractive than the squeaky one, because nothing is as characterless as a freshly-washed body. Could it be that it is this that is making you hesitate?

To which all I can say is - bring on the sweat! the twigs in the hair, the makeshift outfit, mismatched shoes, whatever. It speaks to actions, lustily engaged in. Of an idea, or a topic, so compelling that appearance takes second place.

If you pull the plug on Sleepy Hollow, while retaining the umpteenth cute girl with big eyes I'll have to go elsewhere for my entertainment - along with all my Sleepy compatriots.


Remember: It may be sleepy, but it's never a bore or a yawn.


(c)2015 Daisy Morant

Labels: , ,